Doctors Note Logo

Published on: 10/1/2026

What a lobotomy was, why it was done, and why it stopped

A lobotomy was a psychosurgical procedure that severed connections to the brain's prefrontal cortex, used from the 1930s through the 1950s to calm severe symptoms of schizophrenia, depression, and other conditions when no effective treatments existed. It fell out of favor as evidence mounted of devastating outcomes, including personality changes, apathy, seizures, and death, and as antipsychotic medications like chlorpromazine offered a safer alternative in the mid-1950s. There are several important historical and medical details to consider, including how modern, highly targeted neurosurgery differs from this discredited practice, so see the complete answer below.

If you or someone you care about is struggling with mood, thinking, or behavior changes, understanding the possible causes is the first step toward effective, evidence-based care rather than fear. Take a free, instant, online symptom check to clarify what may be going on and get guidance on the right next steps.

Last reviewed for medical accuracy: 10/01/2026

answer background

Explanation

What Is Lobotomy?

A lobotomy, also known as a leukotomy, is a type of psychosurgical procedure that was once used to treat severe mental illness. In broad terms, it involves cutting or scraping away connections in the brain’s prefrontal cortex. Developed in the 1930s, lobotomies were hailed as breakthroughs for patients with conditions that modern medicine now treats with medication and psychotherapy.

Why Lobotomies Were Performed

From the 1930s through the 1950s, psychiatrists and neurosurgeons turned to lobotomy for patients whose symptoms proved resistant to then‐available treatments. Common reasons included:

  • Severe depression or anxiety that did not respond to talk therapy
  • Treatment‐resistant schizophrenia with agitation or hallucinations
  • Obsessive‐compulsive behaviors causing major functional impairment
  • Extreme aggression or self‐harm in institutional settings

At the time, long‐term hospitalization was the only alternative for many of these patients. Lobotomy offered the hope—though often only partial—of relief and reduced institutional burden.

How Lobotomies Were Done

Two main techniques emerged:

  1. Prefrontal Leukotomy (Egas Moniz, 1935)

    • Small holes drilled in the skull
    • A wire loop (leucotome) inserted to sever white matter tracts
    • Multiple cuts made to disrupt connections
  2. Transorbital Lobotomy (Walter Freeman, 1946)

    • Access through the eye socket using an orbitoclast (specialized instrument)
    • Instruments driven into the frontal lobes with a mallet
    • Procedure could be done without a full operating room

Key points:

  • Early patients often received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) beforehand.
  • Procedures typically lasted under an hour.
  • Sedation and local anesthetics varied widely in quality and dosage.

Outcomes and Side Effects

While some patients showed reduced agitation or “calm” behavior, many experienced significant collateral effects:

  • Emotional blunting or apathy
  • Loss of initiative and motivation
  • Memory and cognitive impairment
  • Seizures in a subset of cases
  • Personality changes that alienated family and caregivers

In an era before rigorous clinical trials and informed consent standards, long‐term follow‐up was limited. Many patients never fully regained independence.

Ethical and Scientific Concerns

By the 1950s, mounting concerns arose about lobotomy’s safety and efficacy:

  • Lack of controlled studies comparing lobotomy to other interventions
  • Reports of irreversible brain damage far outweighing benefits
  • Questions about patient consent, especially for institutionalized or legal‐system patients
  • Growing awareness of medical ethics following World War II

These issues spurred debates in psychiatric and legal circles, pushing medicine to seek safer, more effective treatments.

The Rise of Psychiatric Medications

The introduction of chlorpromazine (Thorazine) in 1952 revolutionized mental health care:

  • First widely used antipsychotic drug for schizophrenia
  • Followed by antidepressants (e.g., tricyclics, MAO inhibitors) and mood stabilizers
  • Offered symptom relief without the permanent brain injury risk

As pharmacological options expanded, lobotomy’s popularity plummeted:

  • Hospitals shifted away from irreversible surgical interventions
  • Psychiatry embraced outpatient treatment, talk therapies, and community care
  • Regulatory bodies tightened rules around psychosurgery

By the late 1960s, lobotomy had all but disappeared from standard practice in most countries.

Why Lobotomies Stopped

Several factors led to the near total abandonment of lobotomy:

  1. Safer Alternatives

    • Medications managed psychosis, depression, anxiety
    • Electroconvulsive therapy remained an option under stricter protocols
  2. Evolving Medical Ethics

    • Informed consent became a cornerstone of medical care
    • Patients and families demanded transparency and choice
  3. Negative Public Perception

    • High‐profile cases and investigative journalism highlighted abuses
    • Popular culture (books, films) portrayed lobotomy as barbaric
  4. Scientific Advances

    • Better understanding of brain‐behavior relationships
    • Noninvasive imaging (EEG, CT, MRI) guided research into mood and thought disorders

Modern Perspective on Psychosurgery

Today, lobotomy is remembered as a cautionary tale in the history of psychiatry. Rarely, highly refined forms of psychosurgery—such as deep brain stimulation (DBS)—are used to treat:

  • Severe, treatment‐resistant obsessive‐compulsive disorder
  • Chronic pain syndromes
  • Certain movement disorders (e.g., Parkinson’s disease)

These procedures are performed under strict ethical oversight, with detailed informed consent, and constant monitoring using modern imaging and neurophysiological tools.

Learning from the Past

Understanding what lobotomy was and why it was done helps us appreciate key lessons:

  • The importance of rigorous clinical trials before widespread adoption
  • The critical role of ethics and patient rights in medical innovation
  • How scientific curiosity must be balanced with caution and compassion

Advances in neuroscience, psychopharmacology, and psychotherapy now offer a spectrum of safer, more personalized treatments for serious mental health conditions.


If you or someone you know is experiencing troubling mental health symptoms, consider a free, online symptom check, using the doctor approved Ubie Symptom Checker. It’s a convenient way to get insights before you see your healthcare provider.

Always speak to a doctor or qualified mental health professional about any condition that could be serious or life-threatening.

(References)

  • * Sato S. Presurgical evaluation of epileptic patients with subdural recording and functional mapping. Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1990 Jun;44(2):289-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1990.tb01408.x. PMID: 2259013.

  • * Lader M. Behavior and anxiety: physiologic mechanisms. J Clin Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;44(11 Pt 2):5-11. PMID: 6643413.

  • * Lindsay J, Ounsted C, Richards P. Long-term outcome in children with temporal lobe seizures. V: Indications and contra-indications for neurosurgery. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984 Feb;26(1):25-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04402.x. PMID: 6698325.

  • * Resnick TJ, Duchowny M, Jayakar P. Early surgery for epilepsy: redefining candidacy. J Child Neurol. 1994 Oct;9 Suppl 2:36-41. PMID: 7806784.

  • * Strauss E, Semenza C, Hunter M, Hermann B, Barr W, Chelune G, Lavdovsky S, Loring D, Perrine K, Trenerry M, Westerveld M. Left anterior lobectomy and category-specific naming. Brain Cogn. 2000 Jun-Aug;43(1-3):403-6. PMID: 10857735.

  • * SAMSON PC, DUGAN DJ, HARPER HP. Upper lobe lobectomy and concomitant thoracoplasty in pulmonary tuberculosis. A preliminary report. Calif Med. 1950 Dec;73(6):547-9. PMID: 14792355; PMCID: PMC1520735.

  • * Braslow JT, Starks SL. The making of contemporary American psychiatry, Part 2: therapeutics and gender before and after World War II. Hist Psychol. 2005 Aug;8(3):271-88. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.8.3.271. PMID: 16217884.

  • * Ogren K, Sandlund M. Psychosurgery in Sweden 1944-1964. J Hist Neurosci. 2005 Dec;14(4):353-67. doi: 10.1080/096470490897692. PMID: 16338693.

  • * Greely HT. Knowing sin: making sure good science doesn't go bad. Cerebrum. 2006 Jun:1-8. PMID: 17120373.

  • * Sérgio A, de Souza AS, Marinho V. The history of lobotomy as a neuropsychiatric intervention in Brazil - a case report of a geriatric patient. Neurocase. 2024 Dec;30(6):209-213. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2024.2436216. Epub 2024 Dec 5. PMID: 39636278.

Tell your friends about us.

We would love to help them too.

smily Shiba-inu looking

For First Time Users

What is Ubie’s Doctor’s Note?

We provide a database of explanations from real doctors on a range of medical topics. Get started by exploring our library of questions and topics you want to learn more about.

Was this page helpful?

Purpose and positioning of servicesUbie Doctor's Note is a service for informational purposes. The provision of information by physicians, medical professionals, etc. is not a medical treatment. If medical treatment is required, please consult your doctor or medical institution. We strive to provide reliable and accurate information, but we do not guarantee the completeness of the content. If you find any errors in the information, please contact us.